Posted on: 21st Aug 2025
PSB505IT Human Computer Interaction and Web Development Assignment : User-Centered Redesign and Development of a Web-Based Information System
| University | Coventry University (CU) |
| Subject | PSB505IT: Human Computer Interaction and Web Development |
Introduction:
Background:
By now, you should be familiarized with core Human Computer Interaction (HCI) and Usability Engineering theory through the analysis and evaluation from the website or system you have been working on in the previous assignment.
In this assignment, you are required to re-design and develop a prototype as an enhanced version of website or system you have evaluated from the previous assignment CW1. You are expected to apply the core Human Computer Interaction (HCI) and Usability Engineering theory to the when proposing and designing the new website with high quality interfaces for computer and web systems.
You are highly advice to start the work by generating a range of interface prototypes, from low fidelity storyboards to partial high-fidelity applications for a range of device and system types which include the content development. Then, utilise a variety of tools and techniques for the
generation of creative and highly effective web-based systems. And lastly, conduct thorough evaluations of system interfaces deploying a variety of usability evaluation methods including heuristic analysis, usability tests and cognitive walkthroughs.
Part 1: (Content Development & UI Prototyping process):
You are to identify users’ needs by ensuring that users are actively involved in the mocking-up of the UI for a system that provide a mechanism to support internet-based services – build a website and/or online system to promote the business and for information sharing purpose.
Part 2 (Website & System Development):
Develop a functional website and online system which allowing visitors to get updates and information from the student website, its activities, news, calendar, and interacting with the business owner.
For the site to support part of MLO4 below, include back-end data-entry features to allow the business owner to securely update database and website content.
| Completion of this assignment will address the following learning outcomes: | |
|---|---|
| 1 | Conduct thorough evaluations of system interfaces deploying a variety of usability evaluation methods including heuristic analysis, usability tests and cognitive walkthroughs. |
| 2 | Apply core Human Computer Interaction (HCI) and Usability Engineering theory to the analysis and design of high-quality interfaces for computer and web systems. |
| 3 | Generate a range of interface prototypes, from low fidelity storyboards to partial high-fidelity applications for a range of device and system types. |
| 4 | Utilise a variety of tools and techniques for the generation of creative and highly effective web-based systems. |
Hire a Professional Essay & Assignment Writer for completing your Academic Assessments
Task :
You should ensure the following are included in your website (this list is not exhaustive):
Viva
You are required to demonstrate in a 15-minute Viva, your solution for website for the case study.
Website & Online System
- Backup Utilities
- Appropriate UI Design and Color Scheme
- UX and Interaction Design are well taken care of (Usability Testing)
- Sufficient and relevant contents and information
- Appropriate site navigation, menu and hierarchy
- Admin Panel allowing business owner to update the website such as.
a. Announcement
b. News & Updates
c. Tenant Information
d. Event & Calendar - Other useful or relevant features / functionalities
Item 1 – 6a & 6b are essential requirements & features
Report
- Introduction
- Your artefact must meet the above background requirements. (Persona & Scenarios)
- Proposed Timeline / Schedule – Content Development, Planning and Implementation
- Proposed Website structure (prototypes, wireframes)
- Actual website screenshots
- Testing & Evaluation (Fulfilment of Universal Web Design Principle and Jakob Nielsen’s Usability Heuristics)
- You must cover and explain how the required Intended Module Learning Outcomes were achieved.
- Appendix for:
a. User accounts login credential (admin and other users)
b. Website Restoration / Setup Manual and Guides.
Guidance notes and considerations
Late Submission
- If you are not able to complete your coursework on time due to extenuating circumstances, the ONLY way to receive an extension (up to 5 working days) or a deferral (anything longer than 5 working days) is to contact your module lecturer or Email to CU_ENG@psbacademy.edu.sg
- Extenuating circumstances are defined by CU as ‘genuine circumstances beyond your control or ability to foresee, and which seriously impair your assessed work’.
- Please note that you will need to provide third party evidence to support your reasoning for requiring an extension or deferral.
Buy Custom Answer of This Assessment & Raise Your Grades
Plagiarism and Malpractice
- You are encouraged to check the originality of your work by using the draft Turnitin links on your Blackboard.
- Collusion between students (where sections of your work are similar to the work submitted by other students in this or previous module cohorts) is taken extremely seriously and will be reported to the academic conduct panel. This applies to all coursework and exam answers.
- A marked difference between your writing style, knowledge and skill level demonstrated in class discussion, any test conditions and that demonstrated in a coursework assignment may result in you having to undertake a Viva Voce in order to prove the coursework assignment is entirely your own work.
- If you make use of the services of a proof reader in your work you must keep your original version and make it available as a demonstration of your written efforts.
- You must not submit work for assessment that you have already submitted (partially or in full), either for your current course or for another qualification of this university, unless this is specifically provided for in your assignment brief or specific course or module information.
- Where earlier work by you is citable, i.e., it has already been published/submitted, you must reference it clearly. Identical pieces of work submitted concurrently will also be considered to be self-plagiarism.
Submission Guidelines
There should be a title page which clearly identifies the following:
* Name of the module * Title of the Assessment
* Assessment number * Word count
The word count identified includes quotations, but excludes the bibliography and unless specifically stated, encompasses a discrepancy of + or – 10%.
| Banding | Knowledge and Understanding (30%) | Analysis, Interpretation and Application of Theory (30%) | Quality of Research (20%) | Academic Writing (20%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90–100% | Exceptional knowledge base exploring, analysing and evaluating the discipline and its theory with extraordinary originality and autonomy. | Demonstrates an exceptional grasp of relevant analytical techniques, and the ability to apply these to new and/or abstract information and situations. Shows a highly developed appreciation of the limits and/or appropriate uses of particular analytical and evaluative approaches. Knowledge and understanding of theory, where relevant, is highly detailed. Exceptional appreciation of the limits of theory demonstrated throughout all assessment outcomes. Approach to assessment task is consistently theoretically informed to an exceptional standard. | Exceptional exploration of wider academic sources with a high degree of independent learning which exceeds the assessment brief. Sources have been accurately interpreted and integrated with flawless synthesis, leading to innovative and interesting ideas. With some adjustments, work may be considered for internal publication. | Exceptional answer with coherent and logical presentation of ideas. The answer exhibits a clear argument/line of reasoning with flair and originality. Discipline specific vocabulary used with precision and academic style applied well throughout. No language errors present and referencing in the CU version of Harvard has been employed in an accurate manner. With some adjustments, work may be considered for internal publication. |
| 80–89% | Outstanding knowledge base exploring, analysing and evaluating the discipline and its theory with clear originality and autonomy. | Demonstrates an outstanding grasp of relevant analytical and/or evaluative techniques. Shows a developed appreciation of the limits and/or appropriate uses of particular analytical and/or evaluative approaches. Knowledge and understanding of theory, where relevant, is detailed and sophisticated. Appreciation of the limits of theory demonstrated throughout the work. Approach to assessment task is appropriately theoretically informed. | Outstanding exploration of wider academic sources with a high degree of independent learning which exceeds the assignment brief. Sources have been accurately interpreted and integrated with a high degree of synthesis, leading to innovative and interesting ideas. | Outstanding answer with coherent and logical presentation of ideas. The answer exhibits a clear argument/line of reasoning with flair and originality. Discipline specific vocabulary used with precision and academic style applied throughout. No language errors present. Referencing in the CU version of Harvard has been employed in an accurate manner. |
| 70–79% | Excellent knowledge base that supports analysis and/or evaluation and problem-solving in theory and/or practice within the discipline, with considerable originality. | Demonstrates a detailed, accurate, theoretical understanding. Appropriately selected theoretical knowledge is applied to the individual learning outcomes. Makes excellent use of established techniques of analysis and/or evaluation relevant to the discipline and applies these effectively. Shows developed ability to appraise alternative theories and/or analytic approaches, where relevant. | Excellent exploration of wider academic sources with evidence of independent learning which may exceed the assignment brief. Sources have been accurately interpreted and integrated with an attempt made at synthesis, leading to interesting ideas. | Excellent answer with coherent and logical presentation of ideas. The answer is entirely relevant and focused with a clear argument/line of reasoning throughout. Discipline specific vocabulary used with precision and academic writing style applied throughout. No language errors present. Referencing in the CU version of Harvard has been employed in an accurate manner. |
| 60–69% | Very good knowledge base that supports analysis and/or evaluation and problem-solving in theory and/or practice within the discipline, with some originality displayed. | Makes very good use of established techniques of analysis and/or evaluation relevant to the discipline. Shows developing ability to compare alternative theories and/or analytic approaches, where relevant. | Very good evidence of wider academic reading and independent learning. Sources have been accurately interpreted and integrated with some evidence of synthesis. | Very good answer with coherent and logical presentation of ideas. The answer is relevant and focused. Discipline specific vocabulary is used and academic writing style applied. Minimal language errors may be present but do not impact on clarity of expression. Referencing in the CU version of Harvard is accurate. |
| 50–59% | Good knowledge base that supports some analysis and/or evaluation and problem-solving in theory and/or practice within the discipline. | Makes good use of established techniques of analysis and/or evaluation, relevant to the discipline. Sound descriptive knowledge of key theories with some appropriate application. | Good evidence of academic reading, with attempt at moving beyond the recommended texts. Interpretation of sources is acceptable with evidence of integration. | Good answer with coherent and logical presentation. The answer is largely relevant but lacks focus at points. There is an attempt at using discipline specific vocabulary and academic writing style. Some language errors are present which impact on clarity at times. Referencing in the CU version of Harvard is mostly accurate. |
| 40–49% | Satisfactory knowledge base demonstrating comprehension and formulation of basic knowledge with some omissions at the level of theoretical understanding. Limited ability to discuss theory and solve problems within the discipline. | Makes satisfactory but limited use of established techniques of analysis and/or evaluation, relevant to the discipline. Selection of theory, if relevant to the assessment outcomes is satisfactory but application and/or understanding is limited. | Satisfactory evidence of academic reading, with minimal attempt to move beyond the recommended texts. Interpretation of sources is acceptable, but there may be some instances of misunderstanding. | Satisfactory answer with some attempt at coherence and logical presentation. The answer contains some irrelevant material and lacks focus at points. There is minimal use of discipline specific vocabulary and academic writing style is inconsistently applied. Some language errors may be present which impacts on clarity at times. Referencing in the CU version of Harvard is mostly accurate but with some errors. |
| 35–39% (Marginal Fail) | Outcomes not or only partially met. Restricted knowledge base demonstrated. Limited understanding of discipline. Difficulty with linking theory and problem solving within the discipline. | Attempts at analysis and/or evaluation ineffective and/or uninformed by the discipline. Knowledge of theory inaccurate and/or incomplete. Choice of theory inappropriate. Application and/or understanding very limited. | Limited evidence of reading at an academic level. Sources used may be inappropriate and interpreted poorly. Little evidence of integration. | Answer is attempted but limited. Lack of coherence and logical presentation. The answer contains mainly irrelevant material and lacks focus throughout. Language errors are present and impact on clarity of expression. Academic writing style is not adhered to. Referencing in the CU version of Harvard is inconsistent. |
| 0–34% | Little or no evidence of knowledge base. Little evidence of understanding of discipline. Significant difficulty with theory and problem solving within the discipline. | Absence of relevant theoretical content and/or use of theory, where relevant. Lacks any analysis and/or evaluation. | Inadequate or no evidence of reading at an academic level with poor application of sources and ideas. Answer is likely to include inappropriate references which are misunderstood and not integrated. Possibility of plagiarism OR no evidence of academic research. Answer may not be research based. | Answer is inadequate with serious flaws in coherence and presentation. Poorly structured with multiple language errors which impact on clarity. Weak application of CU version of Harvard referencing style. |
Get Help By Expert
Do you need professional assistance with your caursework? For assignments involving web development, HCI, and other topics, MY Assignment Help provides excellent assistance. Obtain expert advice, thorough prototypes, and usability tests. Are you trying to find a trustworthy thesis writing service? To improve your grades, get in touch with us right now.
Tags:-
Answer
Recent Solved Questions
- Communication Studies Individual Assignment: Professional Job Application for a Singapore-Based Role
- PSY376 Psychology of Trauma, Theories and Applications Assignment: Cyberbullying and PTSD — Evaluating the Digital Threat Through DSM-V Criteria
- PSB500EN Control of Mechatronics Systems Coursework 2 : Modeling and Control of a Nonlinear Underwater Thruster Using State Space and Linearization
- QSM202 Construction Measurement (2 of 4) Architectural and M&E Works Assignment : SMM-Based Measurement and Analysis of Wall, Floor, and Ceiling Finishes
- PSS221 Urban Security and Resilience Assignment: Strategic Approaches to Enhancing Safety and Resilience in [Bangkok/Manila/Yangon]
- PAR303 Ethical Issues in Public Safety Assignment : Ethical Decision-Making in Water Distribution During South Africa’s Extreme Drought
- LB5229 Economics for a Sustainable World Business Report Assignment : A Comprehensive Analysis of Singtel’s Market, Economics, and Sustainability Strategies
- WRIT6000 Professional Writing Assignment 1: A Critical Rhetorical Analysis of Professional Writing Techniques
- Exploring the Theory and Application of Law and Ethical Reasoning in Nursing Practice Assignment
- Mastering Self-Leadership & Global Culture: Analysing Leadership Styles, Organisational Impact & Growth in VUCA
UP TO 15 % DISCOUNT