HR9637 Transforming Self and Organisations Assessment Brief 2026
| University | Northumbria University (NU) |
| Subject | HR9637 Transforming Self and Organisations |
HR9637 Assessment Brief
| Module Code | HR9637 | Module Title | Transforming Self and Organisations |
| Word Limit | The total word limit for this assessment is 3000 words (see exclusions below) | ||
| Weighting | This assessment is worth 75% of the total marks available for this module | ||
| Submission Time and Date | Thu, 27 Aug 2026, before 11.59pm, Singapore Time. | ||
Assessment Task
This assessment task is an Individual Assignment which comprises three parts (A-C):
Part A: Critical Perspectives in Management and Organisation (c. 1200 words)
According to Peter Fleming (2017), human capital theory has helped facilitate the growing individualization of work and resulted in the radical responsibilization of the workforce, with negative consequences for worker wellbeing, economic inequality, and social sustainability. Drawing on Fleming’s (2017) article, as well as theories and concepts from Weeks 1-8 of this module, critically analyse this claim.
Your analysis should highlight some of the transformations in management and organisation we covered in the module, explain how these have progressively altered the meaning and experience of work within organisations, and evaluate the consequences of this for individuals and society more broadly. Your analysis should demonstrate your ability to make critical connections across topics in the module in order to evaluate contemporary practices and their consequences. You should use examples presented in lectures, seminars and/or reading list resources to support your points.
Additional Guidelines for Part A:
- To complete Part A, you must draw on the annotated version of Fleming’s (2017) article titled “The Human Capital Hoax”, which is available on Blackboard.
- Your critical analysis must advance an argument which is supported by theories, concepts and examples from the module. Support for how to develop an academic argument will be provided in seminars.
- Your academic sources should be drawn from the module reading list. You are not required to do any additional research to answer this question successfully. You will not achieve a pass mark if you do not prioritise the reading list.
- Part A of your assignment should be approximately 1200 words in length. The word count is necessarily restrictive. Focus on refining your argument and make sure your writing is concise.
Part B: Alternative Organisation Case Study (c. 1200 words)
Fleming (2017: p. 705) highlights that, “the advocates of Uberization claim it is the future, no matter what. How employees, organizations and scholars respond to this proclamation will shape the politics of work to come”. In other words, Fleming does not accept Uberization as a foregone conclusion, implying that things can be otherwise.
Your task is to identify a case organisation that represents a radical counter-example to uberization by actively demonstrating the principles and values of alternative organising (introduced in Week 9) and critically analyse and evaluate their approach to management and organisation by drawing on theories and concepts from Weeks 9-11 of the module, as well as examples specific to your chosen case. You should justify their status as an ‘alternative organisation’ and explain why you feel their approach indicates a more positive, ethical, and/or responsible alternative for employees and/or society, whilst also acknowledging potential limits or challenges.
Additional Guidelines for Part B:
- Your chosen organisation must NOT have been discussed in lectures or seminars. You may choose an organisation you are familiar with or identify a suitable case from (high-quality) news or media, the reading list, or relevant databases (e.g. Co-operatives UK). Your chosen organisation may operate in the private, public or plural-sector.
- You should name the case organisation, explain what they do (1-2 sentences max.), and include a link to their webpage and/or the primary reference for your case study source before continuing with your analysis. You may exclude this from the work count.
- Your critical analysis must advance an argument which is supported by theories, concepts and examples. Support for how to develop an academic argument will be provided in seminars.
- You may draw on the organisation’s own website and other high-quality journalistic reporting for evidence of the organisation’s values and practices in order to substantiate your analysis. However, your academic sources should primarily be drawn from the module reading list. All sources need to be appropriately referenced using correct formatting.
- Part B of your assignment should be approximately 1200 words in length. The word count is necessarily restrictive. Focus on the most demonstrative issues and make sure your writing is concise.
Part C: Personal Reflection (c. 600 words)
The final part of your assignment should be a personal reflection on what you have learned from studying critical perspectives as a ‘way of seeing’, including what you have learned about yourself. Drawing on your Personal Reflection Log, which must be inserted as an appendix, you should analyse specific knowledge, skills and qualities that you have developed through the module and consider how these will support your ability to manage responsibly and/or bring about positive social change. Your reflection should move beyond description and consider concepts and frameworks such as The Sociological Imagination, Critical Reflection model, and/or the Inner Development Goals (IDGs) in relation to your own values, experiences, and self-development. You should also consider areas where you feel you may need improvement and suggest how you may continue your ongoing process of inner development.
Additional Guidance for Part C
- Where appropriate, your reflection should be supported by academic references that demonstrate the theoretical basis or philosophical importance of the skills you have developed.
- The personal reflection should be written in the first person. However, it is still a formal, academic piece of work and therefore should follow other conventions regarding style and referencing.
- The Personal Reflection Log template is available on Blackboard. You must attach your completed log as an appendix to your assignment. This is excluded from the word limit.
- Part C of your assignment should be approximately 600 words in length. The word count is necessarily restrictive. Focus on highlighting a few key areas that have been most significant for your learning and development in this module.
Achieve higher grades with expert-written HR9637 Assessment solutions.
Are you, like many other Northumbria University students, struggling to complete your HR9637 transforming self and organisations assessment? If yes, you too can choose My Assignment Help SG for expert-written assignment solutions. Our subject experts provide assignment help that is tailored to your course requirements. To build your trust, you can also explore our Northumbria University assignment samples, where we have already delivered expert-written solutions according to students' individual requirements.
- PSY391 Applied Research Methods and Statistics Tutor-Marked Assignment 02, 2026
- PSY391 Applied Research Methods and Statistics Tutor-Marked Assignment 01, 2026
- CS5228 Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining Assignment Brief 2026
- PP0542 Professional Practice and Career Development Assessment Brief 2026
- BBS2025 Computational Thinking for Business Individual Assignment 2026
- COM203 Consulting and Freelancing Assignment Brief 2026 | Murdoch
- HR9516 Human Resource Management Essentials Assignment 1, 2026
- HR9537 Management Research and Analysis Assignment Brief 2026
- A4750C Good Dispensing Practice Graded Assignment Questions 2026
- ECAT101 Airport Systems Assessment Brief 2026 | Temasek Polytechnic
