In this EG7060 coursework you critically assess engineering management practice by comparing two similar safety-critical case studies from the Royal Academy of Engineering’s SCS collection. The report runs to 4,000–5,000 words in Harvard style under the heading “Understanding of Engineering Management Principles”, and you also present your findings in a 10-minute PowerPoint.

Coursework Task

Choose two similar engineering case studies from the Royal Academy of Engineering (RAEng) Engineering X Safety Critical Systems (SCS) case study collection (engineeringx.raeng.org.uk/scs-case-studies) and critically assess the engineering management practices they reveal.

• Report heading: Understanding of Engineering Management Principles
• Word count: 4,000 – 5,000 words (excluding references and appendices)
• Referencing: proper Harvard citations and reference list
• Presentation: a 10-minute PowerPoint presentation on the analysis

Formatting Requirements

• Spelling: use British English spellings.
• Font: a plain, easy-to-read font such as Calibri, size 11 for the body of the report.
• Headings: Title (font size 16, bold); Heading 1 (size 14, bold); Heading 2 (size 12, bold); Heading 3 (size 12, italics).

Submission and Academic Integrity

• Upload the assignment report, the presentation and the Turnitin report on LSBF Canvas with the completed UEL coursework cover page (similarity index stated).
• Complete the GenAI declaration (key ideas only, first text only, syntax and grammar only, or not used). Any AI-assisted wording or idea must be acknowledged in a footnote with screenshots of the prompts used, and the work checked on Originality.AI.
• Follow the University of East London Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage Policy.