Posted on: 18th Nov 2025
NUR09718 Advancing Practice through Research Assignment | Edinburgh Napier University (ENU)
| University | Edinburgh Napier University (ENU) |
| Subject | NUR09718 Advancing Practice through Research |
Marking Rubric : (NUR09718)
| Introduction (10%) | <34% | Fail (35-39%) | Pass (40-49%) | 50-64% | 65-74% (Merit) | 75%+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Key areas:
|
No clear introduction to topic supported by relevant evidence. No key concepts and terms defined. No brief outline of essay. | Partially covered introduction to topic supported by relevant evidence. Some missing information about key concepts and terms defined. Partial outline of essay. | An adequate introduction to topic supported by relevant evidence. Adequate definitions of key concepts. Adequate outline of essay. | Good introduction to topic supported by relevant evidence. Key concepts and terms clearly defined. Clear outline of essay. | Very good introduction to topic supported by relevant evidence. Key concepts and terms very clearly defined. Very clear outline of essay. | Excellent introduction to topic supported by relevant evidence. Excellent, critical definitions of key concepts and terms. Excellent outline of essay. |
| Critique of paper (40%) | <34% | Fail (35-39%) | Pass (40-49%) | 50-64% | 65-74% (Merit) | 75%+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Key areas:
|
Poor description of paper, missing key sections. Insubstantial critical appraisal of paper. No evidence of utilising CASP checklist. Lack of understanding of ethical implications. Lack of summary of appraisal. | Missing key sections in description of paper. Minimal critical appraisal of paper. Partial evidence of utilising CASP checklist. Minimal understanding of ethical implications. Poor summary of appraisal. | Fair description of paper, including most sections. Adequate critical appraisal of paper. Partial evidence of utilising CASP checklist. Fair understanding of ethical implications. Fair summary of appraisal. | Good description of paper, including all sections. Clear critical appraisal of paper. Good evidence of utilising CASP checklist. Good understanding of ethical implications. Good summary of appraisal. | Very good and clear description of paper, including all sections. Very clear critical appraisal. Very good evidence of utilising CASP checklist. Very good understanding of ethical implications. Very good summary of appraisal. | Excellent description of paper, including all sections. Excellent critical appraisal of paper. Excellent evidence of utilising CASP checklist. Excellent understanding of ethical implications. Excellent summary of appraisal. |
| Discussion (30%) | <34% | Fail (35-39%) | Pass (40-49%) | 50-64% | 65-74% (Merit) | 75%+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Key areas:
|
No comparison and contrast of critiqued paper with a range of other research evidence. No critical discussion of the strengths and limitations of different kinds of methodologies, no evaluation of the research process. No evaluation of appropriateness and quality of evidence which informs and advances practice. No critical reflection on potential facilitators and barriers to implementation. | Limited comparison and contrast of critiqued paper with a range of other relevant research evidence. No critical discussion of strengths and limitations of different kinds of methodologies. Limited evaluation of the research process. Partial critical reflection on potential facilitators and barriers to implementation. | Fair comparison and contrast of critiqued paper with a range of other relevant research evidence. Adequate critical discussion of strengths and limitations of different kinds of methodologies. Adequate evaluation of the research process. Fair evaluation of the appropriateness and quality of evidence which informs and advances practice. Limited critical reflection on potential facilitators and barriers to implementation. | Good comparison and contrast of critiqued paper with a range of other relevant research evidence. Good critical discussion of strengths and limitations of different methodologies. Good evaluation of research process. Good evaluation of appropriateness and quality of evidence which informs and advances practice. Good critical reflection on potential facilitators and barriers to implementation. | Very good comparison and contrast of critiqued paper with a range of other relevant research evidence. Very good critical discussion of strengths and limitations of different methodologies. Very good evaluation of research process. Very good evaluation of appropriateness and quality of evidence which informs and advances practice. Very good critical reflection on potential facilitators and barriers to implementation. | Excellent comparison and contrast of critiqued paper with a range of other relevant research evidence. Excellent critical discussion of strengths and limitations of different methodologies. Excellent evaluation of research process. Excellent evaluation of appropriateness and quality of evidence which informs and advances practice. Excellent critical reflection on potential facilitators and barriers to implementation. |
| Conclusion (10%) | <34% | Fail (35-39%) | Pass (40-49%) | 50-64% | 65-74% (Merit) | 75%+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Key areas:
|
No summary of the key points. No conclusions on the implications of the evidence for nursing practice. | Partial summary of key points. Poor conclusions on the implications of the evidence for nursing practice. | Fair summary of the key points. Adequate conclusions on the implications of the evidence for nursing practice. | Good summary of the key points. Good conclusions on the implications of the evidence for nursing practice. | Very good summary of the key points. Very good conclusions on the implications of the evidence for nursing practice. | Excellent summary of the key points. Excellent conclusions on the implications of the evidence for nursing practice. |
| Referencing & Presentation (10%) | <34% | Fail (35-39%) | Pass (40-49%) | 50-64% | 65-74% (Merit) | 75%+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Key areas:
|
Some use of core evidence, which is poorly integrated into the text. Consistently inaccurate use of APA 7th citation method. Shows some attempt to present information but in a poor manner. Poor structure of sentences and paragraphs. Little attempt to follow guidelines for presentation of academic work. | Limited to a variety of evidence and poor wider reading. References poorly integrated into the text. Minor inaccuracies in the use of APA 7th citation method. Shows some attempt to present information in a structured manner. Some information in a logical manner. Structure of sentences and paragraphs. | Limited to a variety of evidence with little evidence of wider reading. Adheres to presentation guidance. Generally, information presented in an adequately structured manner. Attempts to follow guidelines for presentation of academic work. | Use of core and a more extensive range of other evidence that is accurately integrated into the text. Few inaccuracies in the use of APA 7th citation method. Logical presentation of information. Clear, structured sentences and paragraphs. Follows guidelines for presentation of academic work. | Comprehensive use of core and other evidence that is accurately integrated into the text. No inaccuracies in the use of APA 7th citation method. Logical presentation of information. Well-structured sentences and paragraphs. Follows guidelines for presentation of academic work. | Comprehensive use of core and other evidence that is accurately integrated into the text. No inaccuracies in the use of APA 7th citation method. Logical presentation of information. Well-structured sentences and paragraphs. Follows guidelines for presentation of academic work. |
(End of extracted table content.)
Struggling With Your NUR09718 Advancing Practice through Research Assignment?
Get Help By Expert
Many Singapore nursing students find the NUR09718 Advancing Practice through Research assignment challenging—whether due to limited time, difficulty understanding research critique, or confusion about CASP appraisal. But you don’t need to stress. My Assignment Help provides specialised Edinburgh Napier University Assignment Help. Before placing an order, you can even review our NUR09718 sample paper to see the quality and structure we deliver. Get your plagiarism-free, 100% human-written custom essay writing service today and secure high grades with confidence.
Tags:-
NUR09718 ENU
Answer
Recent Solved Questions
- 7WBS2008 Strategic Marketing Planning and Entrepreneurship Assignment CW1 | PSB Academy
- SM9689 Responsible Strategy Individual Assignment Report and Presentation September 2025
- BM9615 Project Management Assessment Individual Report | Northumbria University
- Introduction to Data Communications Assignment Case Study Individual Report | Singapore Management University
- Arts Marketing and Audience Development Assessment 2 Case Study | SMU Singapore
- MKTG1001 Foundations of Marketing Assignment 2 Individual Report | The University of Newcastle (UoN)
- S2010C Health and Wellness Graded Assignment AY2025 Term 4 – Republic Polytechnic (RP)
- RBP040L051 Postgraduate Dissertation Assessment brief – University of Roehampton Business School
- ACFI 2070 Business Finance Individual Assignment – The University of Newcastle (UoN)
- PY2107 Experimental Investigation and Analysis of Behaviour Assignment 2 Written – Research Report , James Cook University (JCU)
