Posted on: 18th Nov 2025

7WBS2008 Strategic Marketing Planning and Entrepreneurship Assignment CW1 | PSB Academy

Assessment Brief 2025

Module Title: Strategic Marketing Planning and Entrepreneurship Module Code: 7WBS2008

 

Assignment Format & Maximum Word count CW1: Situational Analysis Individual Presentation (15 mins +/- 10%, maximum 15 slides)

 

   
Coursework Submission: Time: 23:59

Date: Monday 1th December 2025

Method: Canvas (see detailed instructions below)

Struggling With Your 7WBS2008 Strategic Marketing Planning and Entrepreneurship CW1 Presentation?

Assessment Criteria

Learning Outcomes: Knowledge and Understanding assessed in this assignment:

  • LO1 Develop a critical understanding of the role and processes of strategic marketing planning in the creation of value and/or competitive advantage for an organisation.
  • Evaluate how marketing tactics should be adjusted depending on the context of the organisation, factors in the environment, segmentation, customer personas and consumer behaviour.
  • Critically appraise the role and processes of innovation and business model development to create new ventures, products and services in response to grow the opportunities.
  • LO4. Synthesize evidence within the market environment in the context of contemporary issues, including digital transformation, marketing ethics and sustainability

Learning Outcomes: Skills and Attributes assessed in this assignment:

  • Integrate and apply academic concepts and literature, and secondary research in the context of a strategic marketing plan.
  • Evidence a range of entrepreneurial skills through a new venture or new
    product/service development project including team working, ideation, innovation, evaluation, communication and persuasion.
  • LO4. Critically evaluate key issues using academic concepts and literature.

Transformational Opportunities:

E.g. Use LinkedIn Learning to improve skills

  • Practical assignment that aligns with real-world business functions

Feedback /Marking criteria for this Assignment

  • Performance will be assessed using HBS Grading Criteria (Rubric)

Detailed Brief for Individual / Team Assignment

Assignment Title: Individual Recorded Presentation: Situation Analysis

Description of the assignment, task, content and structure:

Option 1

You have been tasked by your current employer to help them develop a new product or service.

Option 2

You are a marketing consultant specialising in social enterprise. You have been approached by a social enterprise company in the UK to help them develop a new product or service. (You will need to decide which social enterprise you would like as a client.)

Choose wisely as this assignment will lead into your second assignment when you will show your ideation process and report on the new product/service.

Detailed instructions for both options:

Your presentation should provide:

1. A short introduction (1 slide)

To include the purpose of the presentation and a brief overview of the organisation / business unit (option 1) or your client (option 2)

2. An external analysis (2-3 slides)

To include an analysis of the market including an industry analysis, key trends, competitions, supply and distribution. Your focus should be on the macro-environment and you should include some key models  eg PEST, Porters Five Forces

3. An internal analysis (2-3 slides)

To include an analysis of the organisation/business unit. Your focus should be on the micro-environment and you should include some key models eg Balanced Scorecard, VRIO

4. Segmentation explained (2-3 slides)

A detailed customer analysis including a description of the proposed segmentation of the customers available to target and a report of met and unmet needs.

5. A SWOT analysis: (1 slide)

a. Strengths of the internal environment
b. Weaknesses of the internal environment
c. Significant opportunities available in the marketplace, including unmet customer needs.
d. Significant external threats to the competitive advantage of the organisation

6. A summary (1 – 2 slides)

A summary of the significant factors affecting the organisation/unit (no more than 8 in total). You should include a key model eg perceptual  / positioning map

7. Identify the UN Sustainable Development Goal the company meets for Option 2 only (1 slide)

8. Overview (1 slide)

A very brief illustration of how customer value can be created, and competitive advantage obtained, through potential innovation and/or NPD

9. References (1 slide)

At least 10 credible references

You MUST submit using the template available on the assignment information page.

The assignment should be submitted via Canvas as:

1) a word document (this MUST be the template provided within the assignment information section).  This word document will include your AI declaration, the URL address for your narrated presentation and your reference list (all sources should be referenced according to HBS guidelines, using Harvard).

2) a copy of your powerpoint slides

Referencing and Resources:

You should include a minimum of 10 credible references including marketing databases. Read and use a range of recent academic resources, e.g. books, journals, websites for Mintel reports, Keynote, Business Source Complete etc. Do NOT use Wikipedia/ company website references alone, nor should you use Student/ Essay websites.

You must use Cite Them Right Harvard Reference style.

Tips and specific instructions:

  1. Use content in Module Units 1, 2 and 3 to help you complete this assignment.
  2. Use relevant theories and frameworks to help structure your presentation.
  3. You may use any relevant marketing planning models.
  4. Concentrate on your presentation’s critical quality and depth, not the number of points.
  5. Give evidence to support your analysis and recommendations (e.g. market data).
  6. Interpret rather than just present numbers.
  7. Paraphrasing others’ views and citing/referencing the relevant source is generally better than using
    direct quotes.
  8. Check grammar, use UK spelling
  9. Evidence of independent thought and original applications may improve your mark.
  10. Include a cover slide and references should be added to slides at the end of the presentation.
  11. the presentation should be no more than 15 minutes. You may go under the time limit but if you are around 13 minutes or less that implies you have not enough content. Please add the timing on the cover slide.
  12. That means no more than 5 bullet points on a screen containing no more than 1 or 2 sentences. 16.

Please also upload your script on a Word document.

The presentation of the plan should be in your own words. When you have referred to a text, this must be referenced. If you quote short phrases directly from textbooks (you are allowed to do this occasionally), these MUST be referenced correctly following the Cite Them Right referencing (see point above).  It is unlikely that these short quotations will exceed ten words. A plan which contains lengthy quotations will be marked down. Where you quote techniques and theories, they must be supported through adequate and rigorous referencing. It is expected that you will refer both to the suggested texts and further self-researched sources through your own wider reading.

Any specific instructions:

The HBS Grading Criteria (rubric) will evidence how marks are awarded for individual parts of the assignment i.e. Presentation and Structure, Intellectual Curiosity and Referencing, Content, Analysis, Discussion – see Mark Scheme below:

Criteria Weighting
PRESENTATION AND STRUCTURE

  • Quality of slides-  professional quality, clear images, ‘audience friendly’ / use of colour / font
  • Clarity of delivery: business-like, interesting, natural, appropriate (eg volume, speed, appropriate use of humour)
  • Timing: 12 minutes max
  • Reference list included (may be more than one slide)
  • Structure: coherent structure, logical sequence
  • Language – articulate and fluent, language is clear and precise
10%
INTELLECTUAL CURIOSITY

  • Follows Cite Them Right for in-text citation and reference list
  • Uses marketing databases
  • Includes a range of relevant information eg business pages of broadsheetsIncludes appropriate academic referencing of at least 10 credible resources See ‘Referencing and Resources’ detail on page 3
10%
CONTENT / TERMS / FINDINGS / DEFINITIONS

  • Provided task required on the assignment brief and use of concept taught on the module. Undertakes comprehensive market research by applying appropriate models to complete a marketing audit.
  • Must cover:

1. A short introduction to the organisation/business unit (ie your client)
2. An external analysis of the market, trends, competition, supply and distribution.
3.An internal analysis of the organisation/business unit
4. A detailed description of the proposed segmentation of the customers available to target and a report of met and unmet needs
5. A SWOT analysis
6. A summary of the significant factors affecting the organisation/unit (no more than 8 in total)
7. Identify the UN Sustainable Development Goal the company meets.
8. Very brief illustrations of how customer value can be created, and competitive advantage obtained, through potential innovation and/or NPD

 

 

20%

BUSINESS APPLICATION AND INTEGRATION OF DATA / LITERATURE

  • Integration and application of information, relevant marketing frameworks from coursework guidance and module content.
30%
DISCUSSION / ANALYSIS / CRITICAL EVALUATION / CRITICAL REFLECTION:

  • Line of argument, development of discussion
  • Evidence of critical thinking is demonstrated through discussion of the finding against ehtory, and the theories and frameworks themselves.
  • Logical convincing and evidenced argument
30%
Total 100%

Need Expert Help For Your PSB Academy Strategic Marketing Assignment?

Use of Generative AI

Your use of generative AI (genAI) tools in this assessment must follow one of the three categories below. Your Module Leader will indicate which category applies:

You are permitted to use Category 2 – Proofreading only permitted

Category 1 – Authorised use of AI
You are permitted to use genAI tools to create content for your work and to proofread your work. Alternatively, you may use a proofreader or non-genAI proofreading service.

Category 2 – Proofreading only permitted
 You are permitted to use genAI tools (or a proofreader or proofreading service) to proofread your work, but you are not permitted to use AI tools to create content. This applies even if the assessment includes marks for English and grammar.

Category 3 – AI use not permitted
You are not permitted to use genAI tools for content creation or proofreading. This category applies where all or most marks are awarded for language proficiency (including spelling, punctuation, and grammar).

The relevant HBS Grading Criteria (Rubric) for your assignment should be added as a table immediately below the assignment description.  If you are unable to find the Grading Criteria (Rubric), please contact your Module Leader.

INDIVIDUAL NARRATED

PRESENTATION

Presentation & structure Intellectual curiosity (including use & presentation of Harvard Referencing) Content  Application & Integration Discussion /Analysis /Critical evaluation &/or Reflection
Task details  Follows guideline structure & keeps to time limit of 15 minutes (+/-10%)  and no more than 15 slides Follows Harvard style for in-text citation & Reference List. Uses a minimum of 10 reliable and relevant sources including marketing databases Content included – a professional presentation that uses concepts taught on the module. Undertakes comprehensive market research by applying appropriate models to complete the market audit Integration & application of information – drawing on a range of relevant industry analysis and relevant marketing frameworks Evidence of preparation in order to develop the discussion through an appropriate line of argument. Evidence of critical thinking is demonstrated through discussion of the findings against the theories and frameworks.
Marks 10 10 20 30 30
90 – 100 Outstanding Outstanding presentation, structure and narration with outstanding quality of slides: professional quality, clear images, ‘audience friendly’ / use of colour / font.Clarity of delivery:  business-like, interesting, natural, appropriate (eg volume, speed) with articulate & fluent language that is clear and preciseTiming: 16.5 minutes max.Logically sequenced and presented ideas appropriately and coherently  cross referenced. Reference slide providedNo grammatical / spelling errors. Outstanding selection of quality sources, including marketing databases, well beyond core & recommended resources.Outstanding standard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system (follows Cite Them Right for in-text citation and reference list)Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list. Outstanding exploration of topic showing outstanding knowledge & understanding of topic through thorough & appropriate research. Impressive choice and range of appropriate module content including theoretical models.All aspects included. Outstanding business insight & application. Outstanding integration of literature/data into work, showing outstanding links between practical application and theory.Very impressive breadth and depth. Outstanding level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation & reflection, resulting in an outstanding convincing, logical and thoroughly evidenced argument.Highly developed/ focused work.
80 – 89 Excellent Excellent presentation, structure and narration with excellent quality of slides: professional quality, clear images, ‘audience friendly’ / use of colour / font.Clarity of delivery:  business-like, interesting, natural, appropriate (eg volume, speed) with articulate & fluent language that is clear and preciseTiming: 16.5 minutes max.Logically sequenced and presented ideas appropriately and coherently  cross referenced. Reference slide providedOnly minor errors that do not detract from presentation Excellent selection of quality sources, including marketing databases. Evidence of independent searching beyond core & recommended resources.Excellent standard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system (follows Cite Them Right for in-text citation and reference list).Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list. Excellent level of knowledge & understanding of module content demonstrated.Evidence of appropriate reading and research. Includes some theoretical models.Covers all relevant points & issues of assignment brief. Excellent business insight & application. Excellent integration of literature/data into work, showing excellent links between practical application and theory.  Impressive breadth and depth. Excellent level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation & reflection, resulting in an excellent convincing, logical and evidenced argument.

Clearly developed points

70 – 79 Very Good Very good presentation, structure and narration with very good quality of slides: professional quality, clear images, ‘audience friendly’ / use of colour / font.Clarity of delivery:  business-like, interesting, natural, appropriate (eg volume, speed) with mostly clear articulation & language that is mostly clear and preciseTiming: 16.5 minutes max.Logically sequenced and presented ideas appropriately and coherently  cross referenced. Reference slide providedVery few grammatical errors & spelling mistakes. Very good selection of mostly quality sources beyond the recommended resources. Few irrelevant/poor quality sources used.Very good standard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system (follows Cite Them Right for in-text citation and reference list).Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list. Very Good level of knowledge & understanding demonstrated of module content. Includes some theoretical models but could be developed further.Covers most relevant points & issues.Few errors / omissions in content. Very good business insight & application.Very good integration of literature/data into work showing very good links between practical application and theory.

Very good use of literature/data with breadth and depth.

Very good level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation & reflection, resulting in a very good convincing, logical and evidenced argument.

Mostly relevant pointssome may benefit from further development.

60 – 69 Good Good presentation, structure and narration with good quality of slides that are clear, ‘audience friendly’ / use of colour / font.Good delivery with only occasional difficulties with clarity or tone & language that is mostly clearTiming: 16.5 minutes max.Structure is mainly good with some logical flow Reference slide providedSome grammatical errors & spelling mistakes but these seldom impede understanding  Good selection of quality sources but some irrelevant/poor quality sources used beyond the recommended reading.Good standard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system ((follows Cite Them Right for in-text citation and reference list).Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list. Good grasp of the topic & some of its implications presented.Good knowledge & understanding of module content is demonstrated.Minor errors / omissions in content but more links with theoretical models needed Good business insight & application.Good integration of literature/data into work showing good links between practical application and theory.

Good use of literature/data with adequate breadth and depth.

Good level of discussion/analysis/ criticalevaluation & reflection, resulting in a good convincing, logical and evidenced argument

More ideas/points/options could be addressed or developed further 

50 – 59 Clear Pass Satisfactory presentation structure and narration with basic quality of slides / visual aids. Delivery is not always clear and Timing is not within acceptable limits. Structure is satisfactory, but sequencing could be improved.Reference slide providedGrammatical & / or spelling errors which impede understanding.   Satisfactory: Some quality sources used. Research did not go beyond the recommended sources. Satisfactory referencing within text but some inconsistent use of Harvard referencing system (does not follow Cite Them Right for in-text citation and / or reference list consistently). Satisfactory content / level of knowledge of the topic.  Addresses most of the task. Some errors / omissions in content. May benefit from further research. Satisfactory business insight & application. Limited integration with literature/ data – links between practical application and theory need developing. Use of literature/data but limited in breadth or depth. Satisfactory basic evidence of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation & reflection, resulting in a satisfactory convincing, logical and evidenced argument

Some points irrelevant or superficially made so need further development. 

40 – 49  Marginal Fail Weak presentation with weak quality of slides (not clear / crowded / not used as a visual aid)Weak delivery (inaudible) and inadequate timekeeping. Poor structure with muddled work.Reference slide may be missingMany spelling and/or grammatical errors.Must see CASE with feedback Weak: Limited evidence of appropriate research. Some use made of recommended reading, but the majority of sources are irrelevant/of poor quality. Weak use of Harvard referencing system with errors & inconsistently applied (does not follow Cite Them Right for in-text citation and reference list consistently). Must see CASE/ Information Managers (LRC) with feedback Weak: Limited content / knowledge. Limited or muddled understanding of the topic/question.Does not meet all the learning outcomes.Must see CASE with feedback Weak: Unsatisfactory evidence of business application & insightWork needs to show better links between practical application and theory.Must see CASE with feedback Weak: Limited evidence of discussion/analysis/critical evaluation & reflection resulting in a weak argument that needs further evidence to become convincing.

More development & comment needed. May need to do more than describe.Must see CASE with feedback

20 – 39 Clear Fail Inadequate delivery and structure.  Inappropriate style.  Poorly written and/or poor spelling and grammar.Must see CASE with feedback Inadequate: Little evidence of appropriate research. Few quality sources used from recommended reading.Inadequate use of Harvard referencing with many errors &/or inconsistencies. Must see CASE/ Information Managers (LRC) with feedback  Inadequate: Lacking in relevant content/ knowledge. Content irrelevant / inaccurate. Does not meet all the learning outcomes.Must see CASE with feedback  Inadequate: Lacks evidence of business application & insight. Some literature irrelevant to topic.Must see CASE with feedback  Inadequate: Lacking / inadequate level of discussion/ analysis/critical evaluation &  reflection. Descriptive.Must see CASE with feedback
0 – 19 Little or Nothing of merit Nothing of merit: No structure to presentation.  Wholly inappropriate style.  Many inaccuracies in spelling & grammar.Must see CASE with feedback Nothing of merit: No evidence of research. No use made of recommended reading. Sources are irrelevant & of poor quality. Little or no attempt to use Harvard referencing system.Must see CASE/ Information Managers (LRC) with feedback Nothing of merit: Unsatisfactory level of knowledge demonstrated.Content used irrelevant / not appropriate/ to the topic. Does not meet the learning outcomes.

Must see CASE with feedback

Nothing of merit: No evidence of appropriate business application & insight.Must see CASE with feedback  Nothing of merit Unsatisfactory level of discussion/analysis/critical evaluation & reflectionMust see CASE with feedback

Want a High-Quality 7WBS2008 CW1 Presentation for Singapore Universities Standard?

Get Help By Expert

Many Singapore students struggle with the SM9689 Responsible Strategy assignment because of limited time or difficulty understanding the requirements. But there’s no need to worry — My Assignment Help SG provides expert Responsible Strategy Assignment Help aligned with PSB Academy assignment standards. You can even check our SM9689 assignment sample to see the quality before placing an order. Get your custom-written, plagiarism-free, 100% human-written homework assignment writing help prepared just for you. Order today and secure higher grades with professional guidance.

Tags:- 7WBS2008 PSB
Answer
PY2107 Experimental Investigation and Analysis of Behaviour Assignment 2 Written – Research Report , James Cook University (JCU)
No Need To Pay Extra
  • Turnitin Report

    $10.00
  • Proofreading and Editing

    $9.00
    Per Page
  • Consultation with Expert

    $35.00
    Per Hour
  • Live Session 1-on-1

    $40.00
    Per 30 min.
  • Quality Check

    $25.00
  • Total
    Free

New Special Offer

Get 30% Off

Hire an Assignment Helper and Earn A+ Grade

UP TO 15 % DISCOUNT

Get Your Assignment Completed At Lower Prices

Plagiarism Free Solutions
100% Original Work
24*7 Online Assistance
Native PhD Experts
Hire a Writer Now

Facing Issues with Assignments? Talk to Our Experts Now! Download Our App Now!