PSB6013CL Business Research Project Assignment Brief 2026 | PSB Academy
| University | PSB Academy (PSB) |
| Subject | PSB6013CL Business Research Project |
PSB6013CL Assignment Brief
Coursework 1: An individual written Business Research Project (5,000 words)
| First Lecture | |
| Last Lecture | |
| Dr Florence Ng | |
| Submission through Turnitin ONLY |
Overview of the Module
The Business Research Project module is designed to provide students with the opportunity to undertake a relevant piece of written work on a topic appropriate to the field of study. The aim is to provide students with an opportunity to undertake a piece of research, integrating research skills development and extending their knowledge and experience to a specialist area. The topic may arise from literature relating to course of study or a practical business or management problem. Alternatively, it may relate it to current/past work experience. Students may be able to use the research topic that was developed in the Research Methods module. Students will need to think carefully about the exact focus of the Business Research Project topic. The chosen topic needs to be initiated by the student and needs to be of interest, as students will need to spend around 200 hours of work on it. The topic can be further developed through discussion with the Business Research Project Supervisor. The topic selected will need to be appropriate to the course of study, logistically feasible, adequately resourced and will adequately address ethics, safety and any required permissions. Therefore, students and supervisors will need to invest some time in thinking about the chosen area and topic for research.
Throughout the entire process, students will be supported by a supervisor who will guide them through the process. Supervisors will normally meet with their students once every two weeks to review the progress of their work and to advise on changes and improvements. The meetings will normally take place face-to-face and are intended to give students support and provide formative feedback. Students will be able to develop a meaningful study demonstrating and applying skills gained during the course of their studies at PSB Academy.
Intended Module Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of the module, a student will be able to:
- Defend the choice of the research problem relevant to the field of study for research with clearly developed research aims and objectives.
- Compose a critical review of the existing literature that is informing their research topic and demonstrate understanding of areas of literature relevant to the research topic.
- Select, justify and use appropriate research methods to investigate their research topic.
- Appraise the use of research tools and techniques to analyse the data relevant to their topic.
- Generalise their findings and draw relevant conclusions and recommendations that can increase the performance of a firm, sector or an economy.
Final Complete Project: 5,000 words (+-10%)
Submission: Submission of your project will be online via Turnitin on the module web, full details are given below.
Note that Ethics Application for your research study need to be submitted by 1st June 2026. Without Ethics approval, you will not be able to start data collection for your research study
Credits/Weighting:
This assessment contributes 100% to total module mark.
The Brief:
Your final complete project should include the following sections:
- Executive Summary (no more than 1 page, not incl. in word count)
- Introduction
- Literature Review
- Methodology
- Analysis/ Results
- Conclusions
- References (not incl. in word count)
- Appendices (not incl. in word count)
More detailed descriptions of each chapter are provided below.
Executive Summary
This is a brief overview of what your project is about and a summary of the findings of your entire report.
The introduction
This section should provide a lead into your project including the background or issue you are researching, the problem, research question and research objectives.
Literature Review
The literature review should include a thorough review of past literature relating to your research study and should provide a framework for your methodological design and analysis..Typically it includes the following:
- Have only 4 independent variables and 1 dependent variable
- What does the previous literature find on the topic and about your hypotheses
- Develop hypotheses and conceptual framework for the research
- The project title should reflect the content of this chapter.
Methodology
Your methodology should outline your research design, sampling approach, research instrument (e.g. questionnaire, interview questions), any ethical considerations, and the validity, reliability and generalisability aspects.
Analysis/Results (SPSS)
Your findings/analysis/results/discussion can be structured in a number of ways depending on what works best for your particular project. Quantitative and qualitative analysis chapters will tend to differ quite significantly from each other. You can get ideas by looking at some of the journal articles that you reviewed in your literature review.
Conclusions
The conclusion should be selective and pull out the most important and significant aspects of your findings. You should also make recommendations (and discuss implications) for marketing managers, academics and researchers. You should discuss limitations of your study (e.g. small sample) and make recommendations for future research.
References
Your project should be fully and accurately referenced in APA Referencing Style.
Appendices
Be selective here. Do not include everything just in case. Consider whether each item is really necessary. Ensure that all references are referred to somewhere in the main body of the report, otherwise there is no point. Ensure that you do include:
- Research instrument e.g. blank questionnaire, interview questions (discussion guide)
- Ethics documentation (available on Blackboard)
- Participant info, informed consent form, etc
- Proof of ethics approval
(You do not need to include completed questionnaires or interview transcripts)
Formatting Requirements
- Double/ 1½ line spaced
- Arial/Times New Roman font size 12
- Referenced in APA referencing style
- Include Cover sheet (Appendix 1), Submission Form (Appendix 2) and Ethics Approval Certificate plus associated documents
- Include Contents page
- Include page numbers on every page
Note:
Please make sure that your ID number and the module number appear on the actual coursework assignment as well as on your cover sheet.
Assessment Criteria
| PASS-distinction (70-100) | PASS-merit (60-69) | PASS-good (50-59) | PASS-adequate (40-49) | Marginal FAIL (35-39) | FAIL-Very poor (34-0) | ||
| Introduction
(10 %) |
Mark: | ⎕ Research set in context, with comprehensive background discussion provided.
⎕ Scope clearly set/identified for the study. All aspects of the study are clearly outlined. |
⎕ Research set in context, with a good background discussion provided.
⎕ All main areas of introduction included but minor improvements could still be made. |
⎕ Research set in context, with a clear background discussion provided.
⎕ Outline of dissertation structure is detailed. |
⎕ Limited organisational context included and may need further explanation/refining. Shows reasonable understanding of the topic area.
⎕ Dissertation content is outlined. |
⎕ The report does not set a context for the project.
⎕ Many elements missing or need attention. |
⎕ Very poor or no choice of research topic area
⎕ No understanding shown. ⎕Large amount of elements are missing.
|
| Literature review
(20 %) |
Mark: | ⎕ A current and comprehensive review of literature using primarily journal based sources.
⎕ Excellent discussion and summary of main themes/issues of the review is provided |
⎕ Literature review based upon a good range of material.
⎕ Discussion reflect a good knowledge of literature.
|
⎕ A review of main literature using relevant material.
⎕ Some attempt at critical analysis within literature discussion.
|
⎕ A review of main literature using some basic material.
⎕ Limited demonstration of critical analysis.
|
⎕ Flawed and narrow view of literature based upon limited material.
⎕ Lack of critical analysis.
|
⎕ Sources used are largely irrelevant or not relevant and mainly based on textbooks.
⎕ Review does not relate to research objectives. |
| Methodology (20 %) | Mark: | ⎕ An excellent and critical review of research methods. Critical and excellent justification of chosen research design option.
⎕ Substantial and appropriate data collected. ⎕ Evidence of university ethics application and approval. |
⎕ Very good research design chosen and clearly justified.
⎕ Sufficient and useful data collected. ⎕ Evidences of university ethics application and approval. |
⎕ Good and appropriate research design chosen and justification provided.
⎕ Sufficient data collected. ⎕ Evidence of university ethics application and approval. |
⎕ Research design mentioned and some justification provided.
⎕ Limited description of the research process is provided. ⎕ Some data collected. ⎕ Evidence of university ethics application and approval. |
⎕ Limited information on research design and justification of data collection method.
⎕ Insufficient data collected. ⎕ There may be serious issues regarding the ethics procedures-breaches of the University Ethical guidelines. (Note: Dissertation without gaining the timely ethics approval will be automatically marked as a fail.) |
⎕ No justification for data collection methods or unsuitable methods.
⎕ Insufficient or inappropriate data is collected. ⎕ Very serious breaches of University Ethical Guidelines. (Note: Dissertation without gaining the timely ethics approval will be automatically marked as a fail.) |
| Analysis and Results (25 %) | Mark: | ⎕ Outstanding approach to analysis and interpretation of results demonstrating critical insights consistent with findings | ⎕ Detailed and clear analysis with some critical evaluation of findings. | ⎕ A clear but basic analysis with discussion of findings.
|
⎕ Basic analysis with some discussion of findings. | ⎕ Unsubstantiated analysis in either findings or relevant literature. | ⎕ Serious and fundamental errors in the data analysis section, leading to invalid findings. |
| Conclusion (15 %) | Mark: | ⎕ Realistic and feasible recommendations for both theoretical and practical development.
|
⎕ Clear and logical recommendations for both theoretical and practical development.
|
⎕ Clear recommendations for both theoretical and practical development.
|
⎕ A few recommendations for both theoretical and practical development, but these could be more specific with stronger links to the research undertaken.
|
⎕ Limited recommendations for both theoretical and practical development.
|
⎕ A complete lack of clarify regarding how the conclusions are drawn from the findings.
|
| Presentation and referencing (10 %) | Mark: | ⎕ A substantial and quality piece of work. Demonstrates well-structured and coherent arguments and lines of thoughts throughout.
⎕ Correct reference style. ⎕ Few grammatical and typing errors.
|
⎕ Clear and logical presentation with fluent layout and sound structure. All sections clearly linked into overall arguments.
⎕ All literature and information referenced with correct and consistent format. ⎕ Minimal grammatical and typing errors.
|
⎕ Clear structure and coherence of arguments demonstrated.
⎕ Literature and information mainly referenced to requisite standard. ⎕ A few grammatical and typing errors.
|
⎕ Some clear structure and coherence of arguments demonstrated.
⎕ Literature and information mainly referenced to requisite standard but with some inconsistency. ⎕ Some grammatical and typing errors.
|
⎕ Poor structure with inconsistent arguments.
⎕ Literature and information not referenced to requisite standard and poor expression ⎕ Poor presentation and some major grammatical and typing errors.
|
⎕ Unstructured work and poorly presented throughout. Irrelevant arguments.
⎕ Literature not referenced to a passable standard. ⎕ Major grammatical and typing errors. |
Assessment Grading Guidelines
| Class |
Mark range |
Guidelines |
|
Class I
|
Above 70
|
Answer will demonstrate clear understanding of theories, concepts, issues and methodology, as appropriate. There will be evidence of wide-ranging reading and/or research. Answers will be written/presented in a clear, well-structured way with critical implications provided. |
|
Class II : I |
60 – 69% |
Answer demonstrating a very good understanding of the requirements of the assignment. Answer will demonstrate very good understanding of theories, concepts, issues and methodology, as appropriate. There will be evidence of good range of reading and/or research. Well organised and clearly written/presented. |
|
Class II : II |
50 – 59% |
Answer demonstrating a good understanding of relevant theories, concepts, issues and methodology. Some reading/research beyond that recommended may be present. May not be particularly well-structured, and/or clearly presented. |
|
Class III |
40 – 49%
|
An understanding demonstrated, but may be incomplete and with some errors. Limited use of material with limited reading/research on the topic. Likely to be poorly structured and not well-expressed/presented. |
|
Fail |
Below 40 |
Inadequate answer with little relevant material and poor understanding of theories, concepts, issues and methodology, as appropriate. Fundamental errors and misunderstandings will be present. Material may be largely irrelevant. Poorly structured and poorly expressed/presented. |
High-Scoring PSB6013CL Business Research Project Assignment Written to PSB Rubrics
Many PSB Academy students find PSB6013CL challenging because it requires developing a clear research problem, conducting a critical literature review, applying proper methodology, and performing SPSS data analysis within a structured 5,000-word report. That’s why students choose My Assignment Help, where experts provide PSB6013CL Business Research Project assignment help aligned with academic marking criteria and APA standards. We deliver 100% human-written, plagiarism-free research reports with properly justified methodology and strong analytical discussion. You can confidently use our assignment writing service SG for a fully customised solution. For quality assurance, explore our PSB academy assignment samples to see our academic standards.
- A2429C Human Systems in Health and Disease Assignment Questions 2026 | RP
- PS6004EFA Research Project Dissertation 2026 | Coventry University
- S2440C Health Psychology Assignment Brief 2026 | Republic Polytechnic
- HS2255 Law & Ethnics Assignment Brief 2026 | Nanyang Polytechnic
- CH2123 Chemical Thermodynamics Assignment Questions 2026 | NTU
- OMGT2229 Strategic Supply Chain Assignment Question 2026 | RMIT University
- CP3404 Information Security Assignment Brief 2026 | James Cook University
- BME317 Biomedical Devices Innovation Tutor-Marked Assignment Questions 2026 | SUSS
- MKT362 Pricing End-of-Course Assessment Question 2026 | SUSS
- PSY 101 Introduction to Cultural Psychology Assessment 2026 | MU Singapore
