Posted on: 9th Jan 2025

NCO111: Tutor-Marked Assignment (TMA01)

University Singapore University of Social Science (SUSS)
Subject Work and Learning in a Changing World

Tutor-Marked Assignment (TMA01)

Assignment Details

Pick a political or business figure of your choice and comment on how he/she might react to some of the key insights of the NCO111 study guide. Please note that your answer must take the form of a well-substantiated essay.

Additional Guidelines:

  • You must correctly identify and explain the key insights of the NCO111 study guide. You must also carefully examine the key ideas, beliefs, and/or actions of your chosen political or business figure. How would a person who holds such ideas/beliefs or who has taken such actions react to the key insights of the NCO111 study guide?
  • Please note that TMA01 is a research assignment. You are expected to substantiate your arguments with relevant and concrete evidence (e.g. quotations, statistics, specific examples, specific case studies, etc.) drawn from an adequate number of sources (e.g. newspaper articles, academic journal articles, books, etc.).
  • Your essay should not exceed 1200 words (excluding in-text citations and the bibliography). Please declare the word count at the end of your essay.
  • Please use font size 12 and 1.5 line spacing.
  • Please use APA style for your in-text citations and your bibliography. See the examples below:

Hire a Professional Essay & Assignment Writer for completing your Academic Assessments

Order Now

Example of an in-text citation:

Large tech companies have been accused of having “too much power — too much power over our economy, our society, and our democracy” (Warren, 2019).

Example of a reference in the bibliography:

Warren, E. (2019, March 8). Here’s how we can break up Big Tech. Medium. https://medium.com/@teamwarren/heres-how-we-can-break-up-big-tech-9ad9e0da324c

You can find more information on APA citation style here.

Buy Custom Answer of This Assessment & Raise Your Grades

Order Now

Grading Rubric

Finally, please consult the grading rubric below to understand how this assignment will be graded and also to familiarise yourself with the characteristics of a strong/weak essay.

Rubric. The following rubric will be used to assess this assignment

Criteria: Articulation of Arguments (10 marks)

Grade Criteria Description
Excellent (8-10 marks) All of the writer’s arguments are clear, easily identifiable, coherent, and relevant to the needs of the question.
Good (6-7 marks) For the most part, the writer’s arguments are clear, easily identifiable, coherent, and relevant to the needs of the question. But the writer falls short of an “Excellent” grade because a few arguments are unclear/buried, confused/incoherent, and/or irrelevant to the needs of the question.
Average (4-5 marks) A large number of the writer’s arguments are unclear/buried, confused/incoherent, and/or irrelevant to the needs of the question or The writer has articulated an insufficient number of arguments.
Needs Work (0-3 marks) There are no arguments in the essay. or The writer’s arguments are completely irrelevant to the needs of the question.

Criteria: Use of Evidence (40 marks)

Grade Criteria Description
Excellent (30-40 marks) The writer has adduced an impressive amount of relevant, clear, detailed, accurate, and non-generic evidence (e.g. quotations, statistics, specific examples, etc.) in support of his/her arguments. The evidence is of such high quality that the reader is highly likely to find the writer’s arguments to be persuasive. The writer has provided clear and comprehensible citations as and where necessary.
Good (24-29 marks) For the most part, the writer has backed up his/her arguments with relevant, clear, detailed, accurate, and non-generic evidence. But the writer falls short of an “Excellent” grade due to (any of) the following reasons: A few arguments are not sufficiently backed with evidence. Some of the evidence used is irrelevant, unclear, inaccurate, and/or excessively generic. Clear and comprehensible citations are missing from some parts of the essay.
Average (16-23 marks) The writer will be awarded an “Average” grade for this row of the rubric if his/her essay displays any of the following weaknesses: A large number of the writer’s arguments are not sufficiently backed with evidence. A large amount of the evidence used is irrelevant, unclear, inaccurate, and/or excessively generic.
Needs Work (0-15 marks) The writer did not back up his/her points with any evidence at all. or The evidence produced by the writer is completely irrelevant to his/her arguments and/or the needs of the question.

Stuck with a lot of homework assignments and feeling stressed ? Take professional academic assistance & Get 100% Plagiarism free papers

Buy Now

Criteria: Analysis / Engagement with NCO111 Study Guide (50 marks)

Grade Criteria Description
Excellent (38-50 marks) The writer demonstrates a sophisticated and accurate understanding of the key insights of the NCO111 study guide. The reactions suggested by the writer are grounded in clear, coherent, logical, and sophisticated engagement with the key insights of the NCO111 study guide. The writer’s analysis is of such high quality that the reader is highly likely to find the writer’s arguments to be persuasive.
Good (30-37 marks) For the most part, the reactions suggested by the writer are grounded in clear, logical, and thoughtful engagement with the key insights of the NCO111 study guide. But the writer falls short of an “Excellent” grade due to (any of) the following reasons: He/she misidentified or misunderstood some of the key insights of the NCO111 study guide. He/she suggested some reactions that are not sufficiently grounded in clear, logical, and thoughtful engagement with the key insights of the NCO111 study guide. There is a decent quantity of analysis / engagement with the NCO111 study guide in the essay, but not enough to achieve an “Excellent” grade.
Average (20-29 marks) The writer will be awarded an “Average” grade for this row of the rubric if his/her essay displays any of the following weaknesses: The writer misidentified or misunderstood a large number of the key insights of the NCO111 study guide. The writer suggested a large number of reactions that are founded on unclear, illogical, and/or superficial engagement with the key insights of NCO111. There is insufficient analysis / engagement with the NCO111 study guide in the essay.
Needs Work (0-19 marks) There is no analysis in the essay. or The writer’s analytical insights are completely irrelevant to the needs of the question.

 

Tags:-
Answer
BUSM2653 People Analytics Assesment 1, 2026 | Singapore Institute of Management
Request Answer of this Assignment
Recent Solved Questions
No Need To Pay Extra

  • Turnitin Report

    $10.00

  • Proofreading and Editing

    $9.00
    Per Page

  • Consultation with Expert

    $35.00
    Per Hour

  • Live Session 1-on-1

    $40.00
    Per 30 min.

  • Quality Check

    $25.00
  • Total
    Free

New Special Offer

Get 30% Off

Place Order Now
Hire an Assignment Helper and Earn A+ Grade

UP TO 15 % DISCOUNT

Get Your Assignment Completed At Lower Prices

Plagiarism Free Solutions
100% Original Work
24*7 Online Assistance
Native PhD Experts
Hire a Writer Now

Facing Issues with Assignments? Talk to Our Experts Now! Download Our App Now!

iphone android
QRcode
Disclaimer : The Reference papers provided by the My Assignment Help SG serve as model and sample papers for students and are not to be submitted as it is. These papers are intended to be used for reference and research purposes only.

My Assignment Help SG rated 4.9/5 based on 22945+ customer reviews

© Copyright 2026 My Assignment Help SG. All Rights Reserved